In the following video Allan Savory, B.Sc. in Biology and Botany, a deep thinker with lots of great ideas, but with also controversial ideas for instance about the climate change, talks in the video clip about science, peer-review, scientists, universities, and compares these with real-life facts, visible, observable, to think and discuss about. He explains the difference between Academia and Science. Where I have questions, I have added these there where these questions popped up in my mind.

Links to articles, related with the content of the video:

THE NEW PEER REVIEW: Why ‘Unbiased’ Science Is Now Often Misleading
Published: August 24, 2022
By: Jennifer Margulis PhD, and Joe Wang PhD
In: The Epoch Times
https://multerland.blog/2022/09/06/the-new-peer-review-why-unbiased-science-is-now-often-misleading/
Items:
¤ Intro
¤ 2.6 Million Studies a Year
¤ Junk Science
¤ ‘Sneer Review’
¤ When Ideology Drives Decisions
¤ Cancelling Critics, a Technique to Silence Science

EVIDENCE BASED SCIENCE OR PROSTITUTION?
Original post published by: Instytut Spraw Obywatelskich – Institute of Civil Affairs
Title: Nauka oparta na dowodach czy na prostytucji?
About scientific prostitution, the impact of corporations on scientific research and how the dismantling of the environmental and human protection system in Poland has been dismantled, says prof. Janusz Mikuła from the Cracow University of Technology.
Author: Rafał Górski – Poland
Published: 25 February, 2020
https://multerland.blog/2020/02/27/evidence-based-science-or-prostitution/

LARGE CORPORATIONS SPIN SCIENCE TO THEIR ADVANTAGE
On July 5, 2022, Dr. Laura Vandenberg was guest in Green Street Radio (science based podcasts). Patti and Doug Wood spoke with her about the science of spin: targeted strategies to manufacture doubt with detrimental effects on environmental and public health
https://multerland.blog/2022/07/09/large-corporations-spin-science-to-their-advantage/

INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON THE BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF WIRELESS RADIATION
Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G
PDF, 25 pages: https://www.biomedcentral.com/epdf/10.1186/s12940-022-00900-9%20/
Summary: https://icbe-emf.org/events/

THE ODIOUS SMELL OF TRUTH
https://microwavenews.com/news-center/odious-smell-truth
Published: July 20, 2022
In: Microwave News
By: Dr. Louis Slesin

AN ANALYSES OF [ICNIRP]PROF. RÖÖSLI’S PRESENTATION OF AVAILABLE STUDIES ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION AND 5G
https://microwavenews.com/sites/default/files/docs/Hensinger_5G-Roosli_Englisch.pdf
Published: February 2022
Author: Peter Hensinger, MA Board Member of diagnose:funk e.V.
Head of Science

ICNIRP
Collection of 60 paragraphs with evidence that ICNIRP is comprised, creating severe health risks, via false claims, dismissing important science, misrepresenting the scientific evidence due to industry influences, conflicts of interest with the telecommunications industry, inadequate safety testing, fraud, denials, and immorality.
https://multerland.blog/2019/06/02/icnirp/

~

ALLAN SAVORY

1. General information: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allan_Savory
2. Watch: Ecologist Allan Savory exposes consensus science: Peer-reviewed ‘means everybody thought the same therefore they approved it’ – ‘We’re going to kill ourselves because of stupidity’
   Published: June 1, 2021
   By: Marc Morano
   In: Climate Depot
   https://www.climatedepot.com/2021/06/01/watch-ecologist-allan-savory-trashes-consensus-science-peer-reviewed-means-everybody-thought-the-same-therefore-they-approved-it-were-going-to-kill-ourselves-because-of-stupidity/